Recently, I sent one of my blog articles to my daughter, who works as an editor for a New York newspaper.
Her immediate question was:
âDid you use AI to write this?â
I found the question interestingânot because I was offended, but because it points to something we are still trying to figure out about generative AI.
There seems to be a growing prejudice that if AI touched a piece of writing, the writing somehow isnât yours anymore.
But that depends entirely on what you asked AI to do.
I could have written it by hand
Suppose I sat down with a pen and wrote an article in a notebook.
I made spelling mistakes. I crossed out sentences. I rearranged paragraphs. Maybe I couldnât read my own handwriting.
Then I typed the article into Microsoft Word.
Word corrected some spelling mistakes and pointed out grammatical problems.
Would anyone say Microsoft Word wrote my article?
Of course not.
I was still the author. Word was a tool.
So what happens when I use AI in much the same way?
If I write an article and then ask AI:
âPlease correct the spelling and grammar, but donât change my ideas or meaning.â
Iâm still the person who wrote the article.
AI is functioning as an editor or proofreading assistant.
But there is a difference
There is an important distinction between using AI to improve your writing and asking AI to create the thinking for you.
If I tell AI:
âHere is what I want to say. Please fix the grammar and make it easier to read.â
Thatâs one thing.
If I say:
âWrite me an article about this subject,â
and then publish whatever AI produces as though I personally developed all of the ideas, thatâs something else.
Those two activities are increasingly being treated as if they are identical simply because both involve âAI.â
They arenât.
My daughter actually makes the distinction for a living
My daughterâs job as an editor gives her a particularly interesting perspective.
An editor doesnât necessarily create the story.
An editor works with someone elseâs writingâchecking facts, improving clarity, fixing grammar, tightening sentences, questioning assumptions, and helping the writer communicate more effectively.
The writer still has ownership of the underlying story.
AI can perform some of those same editorial functions.
It can catch a typo I missed.
It can point out that Iâve repeated the same thought three times.
It can suggest a clearer sentence.
It can help me turn a rough paragraph into something readable.
But I still have to decide whether the suggestion actually represents what I meant.
The question I think we should be asking
Instead of asking:
âDid you use AI?â
Iâd rather ask:
âWhat did you use AI for?â
Did AI generate the ideas?
Did it write the entire article?
Did it help organize your thoughts?
Did it translate your words?
Did it correct your grammar?
Did it simply catch spelling mistakes?
Those are very different uses of technology.
And the difference matters.
AI shouldnât replace thinking
Iâm not arguing that everything generated by AI should automatically be considered someoneâs own work.
Quite the opposite.
If AI creates the ideas, arguments, research, and article, then presenting all of that as entirely your own raises legitimate questions about authorship and transparency.
But using AI as a writing assistant doesnât mean youâve surrendered authorship.
The important thing is that the human remains responsible for the ideas and the final product.
You have to read it.
You have to check it.
You have to disagree with it when itâs wrong.
And ultimately, you have to be willing to put your name on it.
Thatâs not very different from using a human editor.
The technology is different.
The responsibility isnât.
Maybe we should stop asking whether AI was involved
My daughter asking whether I used AI made me think about how quickly the conversation has become polarized.
Perhaps the better question isnât:
âWas this written by AI?â
Perhaps itâs:
âWhere did the ideas come from, and what role did AI play in expressing them?â
For me, the ideas are mine.
AI is another tool I can use to help communicate them.
Just as Microsoft Word is.
Just as a dictionary is.
Just as an editor is.
And just as a good conversation with my daughter can be.
